Our editorial decisions are ours alone. No brand, agency or affiliate partner sees a story before it goes live or has any input on our verdict. We reject sponsored placements that come with a coverage requirement; we accept review samples only where we retain full control over what we write, and we disclose them in the copy.
We report from first-hand experience where possible. Prices are sourced from operator websites at the time of writing. When we quote a subscription fee, a student discount, a device price or a course rate, we name the operator and date the figure so you can check whether it is still current before you sign up.
We publish clear verdicts, “worth it”, “worth it once”, “skip it”, “beats the alternative”. We prefer specific over polite. An app doing something well gets named; an app overcharging or under-delivering gets named too.
If we get something wrong, tell us via our Contact form and we will correct it, mark the correction inline, and, for material errors, note the change at the bottom of the story with the date.
Some background research is assisted by AI tools; every published story is written, edited and fact-checked by the editorial team of College Hobbies. No article is published straight from a model.
We write from a specific student perspective and we say so in the writing. Where our experience does not cover a reader group, first-generation students, mature students, students with accessibility needs, students on non-standard visas, we say that too, and we point you to specialists we trust rather than pretending we have done what we have not.
For complaints about a specific piece, submit a request via our Contact form with the URL and a summary of the issue. We reply within five working days.